Are Vailas’ policies damaging ISU?
By Habib Sadid
When Dr. Arthur Vailas became the president of Idaho State University in July 2006, he announced, with little or no comprehension of its infrastructure, his intention of making ISU the “MIT of the West.”
Vailas wants ISU to be a research institution like Utah State University, bringing in $150 million in research funds annually. Furthermore, he wants that to happen immediately. Vailas fails to note that USU is a land grant university enjoying substantial federal earmarks. With that significant advantage, it took USU over 30 years to achieve its current research success.
The idea of increasing research funding at ISU is not new. The challenge is to achieve this goal with very limited resources and still maintain ISU’s existing strengths.
ISU is a small, regional institution with a reputation for excellent teaching. This is primarily because most of the undergraduate courses are instructed by experienced professors. ISU has a history of successfully preparing graduates for post-graduate education and productive careers. ISU alumni attend some of the most prestigious graduate schools in the U.S., and their educations compare favorably with graduates from the highest ranked universities.
At the Sept. 30 ISU General Assembly, Vailas proposed that ISU begin relying on graduate students to instruct undergraduate courses. This would free faculty to spend their time on research and is more “cost effective.” As a taxpayer and a parent, do you want the responsibility for your children’s education to be in the hands of other students who have completed a few more semesters of study?
Last year, the ISU faculty raises were based entirely on research performance. Nominally, faculty members are expected to spend 60 percent of their time on teaching with the remainder divided between research and service activities. How can the administration ignore 60 percent of the faculty’s responsibility and a university’s very reason for existence? I believe that this is a breach of contract between ISU and its faculty, not to mention a breach of public trust. Vailas pays only lip-service to education. If that is not the case, why do his deans make statements like: “It doesn’t matter if you are the best teacher in the world, research is our priority.”
Normally, a leader with a vision for change presents a comprehensive and realistic road map. Vailas’ plan for the transformation of ISU into a research university is for faculty to “work nights and weekends.” Recently, Vailas publicly repeated this “plan” stating that faculty have “24 hours a day” and “seven days a week” to achieve his goal. For Vailas, the burden of extra work is light, as long as someone else is doing it.
ISU faculty members already work, on average, more than 50 hours a week, with teaching loads unheard of at research institutions. Many dedicate their summers to unpaid scholarship. Professors have families, children and lives. They are dedicated professionals, but shouldn’t be expected to abandon their other responsibilities to pad Vailas’ resume. Should Vailas enforce his will on the faculty, students will be neglected, and standards will fall.
Recently, ISU has lost a number of fine faculty and administrators. Senior faculty are being intimidated, forced out or pushed aside. Dedicated, hard-working and veteran professors are increasingly “hoping to hold on until retirement.” Abuse of administrative power continues under the Vailas administration. Retaliation against those who have raised their voices is the rule.
Junior faculty are under pressure to bring in research funding otherwise they will be fired. These faculty, who are literally investing 70-80 hours a week in their careers, hear these unrealistic expectations and are looking for the door. They will be difficult to replace; qualified faculty will be reluctant to come to a university known for heavy workloads, questionable administrators, threadbare infrastructure and salaries below the national average.
Recently, the Nuclear Engineering Department lost four professors, leaving only two administrators who teach part-time. Three of the lost faculty were “recent hires.” The fourth was a 14-year veteran who held the department together through the hard times with his 80-hour work weeks. This gentleman took a better paying position with a 40-hour work week.
Many professors are choosing to leave ISU because they realize there is no future here under Vailas’ “blood from turnips” policies.
Vailas speaks of “honesty, transparency and accountability” without holding administrators accountable for their actions and performance. Hiring unqualified faculty for administrative positions, Vailas continues shuffling his fishing and hunting buddies from one administrative position to another.
If Vailas wishes to change the direction of ISU, I recommend that he and his administrative underlings begin fundraising to improve research facilities and reduce faculty teaching loads. With additional resources, ISU can improve its research without affecting instructional quality. Then ISU might hire qualified, post-doctoral students to bring new ideas, help with teaching and write research proposals for funding. ISU cannot become a research institution overnight, but can make progress toward that goal and still be true to its educational mission.
Vailas seems hell-bent on transforming ISU into a research university regardless of the cost to students and taxpayers. Since it is not feasible to achieve this goal immediately, it appears to me that Vailas is trying to enhance his resume and use ISU as a stepping stone to a more prestigious university. I strongly believe that Vailas’ policies are damaging ISU by trading quality in higher education for the promise of fast money.
Habib Sadid has been a professor of engineering at Idaho State University for 21 years. He has received numerous accolades including Distinguished Master Teacher and Distinguished Public Service awards from Idaho State University and Excellence in Engineering Education from Idaho professional engineers.
“Publish or Perish”, never worked at Berkeley and it has even less of a chance here. d
Can the students vote out Vailas or his policies so that quality education can continue?
Habib Sadid is a chronic complainer. Dr. Vailas has done a good job in trying to improve the quality of our university.
Poky 24,
You must be a fishing buddy of Vailas. Dr. Sadid provided enough evidence to question Vailas’ leadership, ethics and professionalism. Do you think Dr. Sadid could have had his job, if any of those allegations was wrong? You did not provide even one reason for why you think Vailas has done a great job, but you are accusing a true hero for being chronic complainer. Has Dr. Sadid ever been wrong before including Bowen, Lawson, Wharton, and Jay Kunze? In my opinion, Dr. Sadid is a true and abrave citizen and a hero. No one in the community has the … like Dr. Sadid to stand up for corruptions. You truly should be ashamed of yourself and you are no better than Vailas or others. In my opinion, Dr. Sadid hit Valas right on the head and Vailas must leave ISU before damaging it further.
Dr. Sadid’s comments are right on the nose. Faculty aren’t being more vocal about their concerns because Vailas has shown that objections or criticisms are met with retaliation, not discussion or negotiation.
Why do I get the sneaking suspicion that three out of the preceding five comments are actually Dr. Sadid? Perhaps I’ve been on the internet for too long… I’m seeing sockpuppets everywhere.
IAMB,
When I can openly express my opinion in the news papers or publicly, do I need to be wimp like you who cannot even sign his real name under his comment?. The entire university faculty and staff and my fellow community members know who I am and I have no fear to speak out, because I do believe in democracy and the value of freedom of speech. Indeed, I have sent personal letters to Vailas and his administration about the corruption on the Campus. If I wanted to be a sucker, with my outstanding credentials, I would have had much better position today. I do my job right and I raise my voice when I see corruption. There is nothing for me in doing what I am doing but, retaliations, harassments, and stress. Of course, I am proud of what I am doing and I have bigger … than anybodies including you Mr. IAMB. Do you have any?
IAMB, you have been on internet a lot, probably, you were on Porno sites and wasn’t able to grasp the facts. This site doesn’t need comments from people like you. You are absolutely wrong. 3 out of five comments are not from me. For your information, I am embarrassed to see that my colleagues support me but, first they look around to make sure that no one is there and then they whisper in my ear how supportive they are. Some are afraid to talk to me in public, because they afraid of being labeled by the administration. This is the extent of our democracy. I have no fear. I am repeating one more time that, Vailas’ administration is a corrupt and failed administration and Vailas is literally destroying ISU. ISU administration is an “old boys club” and I congratulate Dr. David Delehanty, the faculty senate chair for joining the club. I will prove every comment I have made about the ISU administration in the court of law (coming soon) and publicly announce the result.
IAMB, you must be ashamed of yourself.
Habib Sadid, Ph.D., PE
Professor of Engineering
Idaho State University
As a former graduate student of ISU, having nothing to do with either gentleman, I’m pretty disgusted about the airing of dirty laundry and personal potshots ISU employees and staff take against each other in the press.
Well Dr. Sadid, you really are one hell of a guy, what with the name calling and insinuations in your reply. You really ought to learn to relax a bit before you blow a gasket… especially if my sockpuppet comment set you off so bad. It would take far too long to explain why I came to the conclusion I did in the first place, but if I’m wrong, then I apologize.
Now, how about you be decent enough to apologize for your comments, then we can all sing Kumbaya or something.
A “Hero”? wow!
I agree with “me” – you are a coward for publically taking shots at Dr. Vailas.
Well said, Habib. And you make a good point about Pocatello being a stepping stone for Dr. Vailas to a another university. Why else would he and Laura commute from Sedona.
Poky24, are you Tingey?
Folks,
Dr. Habib Sadid is possibly the finest professor I have come across in fifteen years of contact with higher education. He has more then earned the many, many accolades he has received. He is correct in stating that his opportunities outside the educational field are unlimited. His love of education and the desire to pass along his knowledge have kept him in the field of education. He has also passed along his passion for knowledge to a great many students. I don’t know Dr. Vailas but I did know Dr. Bowen. Dr Sadid’s thoughts there were right on. If Habib tells you it’s going to snow in August your going to want to have a coat handy.
No OddJob, I’m not Tingey. Are you Sadid’s mother?
Dr. Habib Sadid speaks truth to power. The levels of corruption is enough to make your head spin. Throw Vailas out.
Being a total outsider and not knowing either individual this comes across as follows:
1. Dr. Habib Sadid has those who appear to have earned his respect.
2. Dr. Habib Sadid’s detractors appear to be a bunch of trash mouths, i.e. they make charges that I can neither find nor see but they still write them here. Nowhere do his detractors offer intelligent second choices or solutions to what he wrote about. They ignore his remarks at best.
3. Dr Vailas seems absent from the discussion.
ISU apparently has a problem, when things get out of hand the press is a good release valve. You don’t solve problems by resorting to name calling. Either he has a valid position or not.
The remark about College Presidents having their eyes elsewhere has merit. There seems to be this cadre of people who are constantly on the move in America from one college to another. Seldom do they come from the faculty at the colleges but always outsiders who come in, don’t fit, have no clue as to what is going on and then move on and the college then pays a huge sum to outside people to do a search for another president. Presidents of colleges need to come from inside the college faculty. You seem to not have learned that lesson at ISU.
Hit or a miss?
President Vailas does not care one wit for ISU, its history as a fine teaching institution, its faculty, or its students. The destruction he is creating in his attempt to build his own career is enormous. The only people who support the administration on campus are those who are expecting some kind of goodies for their toadying.
Concerned,
You’re obviously wrong as I am not expecting any “goodies”. It would be refreshing to see some faculty actually putting forth some effort to advance their profession rather than simply coasting through a relaxed, stress-free career in academia. Obviously President Vailas’ expectations of such are distressing to some.
The assumption behind your comment is typical of the research first, middle, and last faculty members–that those who choose to focus more energy on the craft of teachign are “coasting.”
Why does every university have to aspire to the goal of becoming a Carnegie Research I (or whatever name they’re using now-a-days). Oh yeah, I know why? So administrators can move up to other, more prestigious universities and so faculty members can feel less badly being “stuck” in a place they don’t want to be. Too bad the people who want to forsake ISU’s teaching mission couldnt’ get jobs at MIT, they simply have to envy MIT guys from afar and insult everyone else who actually chose ISU for what it is.
We had Vailas at our university for a few years, and he was nominally a member of our department. It became very clear after his arrival that we were only a stepping stone to him.
He is a member of a class of powerful, ruthless, clever people who are the academia version of the Wall Street big-shots who destroyed the life savings of many ordinary people. These are the 21st century Huns rampaging through US universities.
Prof. Sadid has honed in on the essential issues in his article. He is direct and harsh, but he is correct.
You need not agree with him, but heed his words and with them in your mind be alert for evidence that will help you make up your own mind.
If you want to become aware of other universities in turmoil, look up UIUC, UNLV, UCSC, UHawaii. There are many common threads connecting their situations, and the problem is not going to go away for decades, certainly not without clamor from the public.
I had the opportunity to take a number of classes from Dr. Sadid and no other professor at ISU was able to present difficult material in a more understandable way. The way he instructs is the exact opposite of “coasting”, as an extremely ignorant poster previously stated. I also worked with him on several extracurricular projects and he did nothing but represent ISU and its interests very well. While his opinions may have an emotional tint to them, the judgement which forms those opinions is right on. ISU would do well to listen to him.
It is a matter of quality versus quantity. In observance, perhaps ISU is lacking both under this administration. To lose experienced professors who pursue better work environments that are non threatening affects both quality and quantity. The public must question who is in there best interest. Students who struggle to get by financially deserve quality for the education they are paying for. Tax payers deserve to have there dollars spent in a manner that benifits the majority not selected few. Cuddo’s to Dr. Sadid for speaking up. The administration is in a position of which public opinion should matter and it is unethical and illegal to go after those who are outspoken. If there is no check system for those in power then, what kind of Democracy is this.
I took a Mechanics of Materials course from Dr. Sadid. Out of all of the professors I had while attending ISU, Dr. Sadid stands out as one of the best. As another commenter has said, he had the ability to take a difficult subject and make it understandable and relevant to real world problems.
People attend ISU to get a good education and we need more professors like Dr. Sadid who are able to provide a world-class education.
I support Dr. Sadid for taking a public stand for what he believes is right. Based on my time in his classroom, I know Dr. Sadid to be an honest and honorable person. It’s sad that politics is driving away ISU’s greatest asset; people.
ISU as the MIT of the west? That one doesn’t even pass the giggle test.
Eric Streeper, P.E.
To Poky24: A Hero is someone who stands up for what is right, even so he or she could get harmed while doing so. Not standing up for what is right and repeatedly taking all the BS that the leader dictates lead “passive” citizens in Germany to the Holocaust of 6Mill. human beings. I don’t know Dr. Sadid but I admire him for having had the guts to practice his right of free speech and to vent his very valid concerns.
What is he supposed to do now Poky24, roll over?
It seems that lots of hard working professors at ISU are overworked and fed up lately, I’m glad I had the opportunity to be taught by well educated and passionate professors at ISU, it is not easy to attract high quality teachers to this area. Dr. Vailas has a goal it seems and that’s ok as long as he pulls his load, puts in as many hours as his staff, treats them with respect and listens to staffs feedback and suggestions. But,
I forgot, he already knows EVERYTHING and therefore he is entitled to treat devoted employees like pee-ons while he is making a big bundle of money.
Isn’t it telling that those who are generally in support of Dr. Sadid put their names on the post, while those who just want to slander and spew hate hide behind anonymous titles. I am an ISU engineering graduate (1999) and thank Dr. Sadid for his excellent intruction, and commitment to the students, while I was there. It is unfortunate that the College of Engineering has been diminished with the removal of this fine professor. If anyone from the Alumni Association pays attention, don’t bother calling for support until Dr. (Dictator) Vailas is removed from office.
Dan Vetter, P.E.
I really enjoyed Dr. Sadid’s classes. Definitely a fine teacher. I think that his antics have been cantankerous at times, but it is appalling that Vailas thinks that he has the power to “fire” a tenured professor. This is going to incur additional cost and headache to ISU unnecessarily.
I feel a little hurt that people latch on to the comment of ISU being the “MIT of the West” as ludicrous. You may be surprised to know that there are many similarities between the hard-working, down-to-earth faculty of ISU and the folks at MIT. I feel very strongly if it wasn’t for ISU I would not have been able to get into MIT.
Furthermore, I don’t believe that Valias’ sudden push is the answer in making ISU better. The exceptional faculty and “hands-on” approach are what will continue to make ISU’s engineering program strong, not grad students teaching classes.
As a previous student of Dr. Sadid’s, I can tell you that he is one of the most outstanding professors I knew. He genuinely cares about his students. If he only cared about his job, he wouldn’t speak out; he’s just go with the flow. But he really does care. 8 years after graduation and he still does whatever he can for me.
As for the technology gig; this deal started sour to begin with in the first place. There are so many things wrong with it. The top issue, as a potential employer for future students, is accredidation. You lose that, and you will with this merge of technology and college of engineering, then you lose your ability to obtain a PE license.
There are several reasons this is a bad idea. When I was there in 2002 and these talks began, our biggest concern is that no one talked with any of the engineering students to get their opinion. They (the admin) don’t know, and don’t care, how their decisions affect the current students. Until Dr. Sadid is reinstated, ISU will no longer get donations from me. I’d rather send my money to an institution that has the best interest in their students, not their individual legacies.
Call me if you need me, Dr. Sadid. Any time.
Jaren Tolman, P.E., MBA
I rreceived my master’s degree from ISU in 2000. I can tell you one thing, it was well known at the time that Dr. Sadid was one of the highest quality teachers in the United States. I don’t know about all that has transpired there since I graduated and moved on but there simply was no better professor that I have ever seen. He was of the highest intelligence and could convey complex ideas into simple-to-understand terms and all students loved him. He has my highest regards then and now. Mark Hall
I am a current student attending ISU and have been following Dr. Sadid’s case. I never had the oppertunity to meet Dr. Sadid or attend one of his classes while he was at ISU but I have a lot of respect for him and agree with several of his points of view. Two years ago I stood up against corruption that I was seeing with the Native American Services program at ISU. This has been an on going issue since at least 2004. I reported this corruption to several levels of the administration but the Provost Office, Academic Affairs and Student Affairs office turned a blind eye. We even got a internal investigation to be condcted and the final report was given to President Vailas but yet ISU still did not take any action. I fully understand the frustration, when this issue is widely known but faculty members refuse to speak up unless it behind closed doors and fake names on open forums like this one. I have watched as the administration has protected one of their own even when the evidence is overwhelming of crimes being commited within the Native American Services program. I have been the target of retaliation for speaking up but what I have been taught from the elders of my Tribe, “you have to do what is right, speak the truth”! In closing, keep up the good fight Dr. Sadid!