by Jim Avichouser
Well, you did it. You chose the bang on wrong person for president and now you are gonna pay for it. You somehow believe that Donald J Trump has something for you behind door number three. You also believe that Vladimir Putin is a legitimate leader of a country that we have effectively been at war with since the turn of the 20th century. Please don’t give me any crap about cooperation to defeat the Nazis. That cheese is old and moldy. You do realize don’t you that everything done or said in Russia is recorded via hidden camera and microphone? So, now you want to pretend that your chosen savior did nothing absolutely embarrassing and unpresidential during his supposedly short stays in Moscow? You really want to believe that they have nothing that, if revealed, would cause utter scandal and upheaval in Washington, DC, should the Russians ever decide to make it common knowledge? Am I writing above your comprehension level? Get better learned if I am!
The Soviet Union broke up and a couple of decades later, all of the rubles have ended up in a precious few baskets. Just what lawful authority do you think presided over those transactions? Ha! They didn’t! The law of the jungle and an ages old organization of criminals we like to call a Mafia divided the spoils among themselves.
Yeltsin, the Pickled old bugger the people thought they could trust, backed by the Mayor of Saint Petersburg, You guessed it, Vladimir Putin, who watched his six while they got on with the bloody business of butchering the old CCCP. How is it that a former KGB major ends up with a bank account conservatively valued at upwards of 40 Billion dollars? Do you really believe that he just rolled up his sleeves and put his nose to the grindstone?
Oh, but I digress. How is all of that connected with the putative leader of the free world? Everyone claims they want to know, except of course the administration and party of the aforementioned Donald J Trump. They are holding an investigation aren’t they? You, know, to see if the Russians were complicit with Trump surrogates during our supposedly democratic election process. Problem is that they keep showing his people what information they need to hide if they want to avoid convictions for Treason. Yes, the big T word. You know the one that has to do with aiding the enemies of the United States of America. We’re talking Benedict Arnold stuff here, and a spade is in fact, a spade.
I hate to keep bringing it up but decades ago, I took an oath, you know the one where I pledge to defend the Constitution and our Republic against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I really did that. I had thought that a bunch of you did exactly the same thing, but it turns out you may have had reservations or purpose of evasion or some such. How does the line go in the movie? “You can’t handle the truth!” You better get it up! You are on the verge of losing our beloved republic and our Constitution to boot.
Yeah, I know short term gains in the Stock Market and all that happy horse crap. Make America great again. I missed the part where we became less than great. Unless, one counts the part where we gave up our sacred honor and our integrity and nasty stuff like that! Things that mattered about being an American as opposed to some other thug in the world.
If Jesus came today? Well, I think you know what would happen. Heal the sick, (only if they can pay for it) Feed the hungry, (well, you know they have to earn it first). Love one another even as I have loved YOU! Not if they look different, talk different, and worship in some other way! Nuh uh! We don’t want any of those kind of people hanging around. You people missed the memo. Jesus didn’t call the Crusades. That was all of you hateful people who couldn’t stand that people not like you controlled the Holy Land. For the most part, they still do. Control it that is. Do you still resent that? You had to pay for access to Eastern Spices. Poor Schmucks.
You can’t reverse hundreds of years of tradition and progress in a single election cycle. You can’t erase the American Spirit and the true underpinnings of our republic if you tried. And, man are you trying hard to do just that. SHAME
America has become the laughing stock of the world. Your conservative Renaissance won’t last beyond the things you don’t know and don’t care to understand. We are about to lose control of the world Economy and with that any semblance of solvency we ever had. We will become a hiss and a byword…something best forgotten. The wall will become a relic at which future generations (should humans actually survive) will scoff and and ask: “What the %&(@ were they thinking?”
The dog will come and pee on your leg and you still won’t know what is going on.
Jim Avichouser is a former military Intelligence analyst and reporter. He took his first degree in Soviet Studies from the University of Maryland. His oaths for enlistment and commissioning have never and will never expire.
What does it all mean? The Trump Card wins! Trump (triumph): "Any playing card of a suit that ranks higher than any other suit; any advantage held in reserve until needed; a fine person or good fellow," Webster's. From his initial announcement, 6/15/2015, I proudly and bravely ran my homemade bumper stickers early on, had three ripped off with two unfriendly notes left on vehicles; and confidently wore my "Trump/Pence" T-shirt. I remained convinced that Donald Trump could facilitate bringing back the America that I previously recognized as a forth-generation independent Irish conservative. Congratulations to all of us! Now let's get to work!
By Nick Gier, Professor Emeritus, University of Idaho
The GOP House Select Committee on Benghazi has interviewed 100 witnesses, spent $7 million of its own funds, and has forced other agencies to spend an additional $13 million. The Defense Department is at its wit’s end and is rightly accusing the committee of making frivolous requests.
Letters from Gen. Dana Chipman, the committee’s own former chief counsel with 33 years’ military experience, have been now released. In one to former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Chipman states: “I think you ordered exactly the right forces to move out and to head toward a position where they could reinforce what was occurring in Benghazi.” Contrary to the right-wing press, there were no orders for those forces to stand down.
One of the most inflammatory charges made against Hillary Clinton was that she dismissed the Benghazi deaths by saying “What difference does it make”? In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (1/23/13), the gravity of this loss is clear: “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”
There is also the accusation by GOP Rep. Darrell Issa that Clinton had “personally signed” a cable requesting reduced security in Benghazi. Fact checkers at the Washington Post awarded Issa four Pinocchio’s (a Whopper) for this lie. The fact is that every cable from the State Department has the Secretary’s signature renders its author unidentifiable.
GOP Sen. Rand Paul charged that Clinton “was asked repeatedly to provide security in Benghazi on several occasions, including direct cables.” Investigators at Politifact have judged this claim “mostly false.” They state that “no one has shown Clinton willfully ignored the cries for help from Libya. Paul’s office didn’t provide evidence linking requests for security directly to Clinton.” All cables to the State Department cables are addressed to “SECSTATE” in “WASHDC,” but only a select few ever reach the secretary.
On the October 15, 2012, Fox New’s Sean Hannity claimed that “somebody at the State Department was watching the attack in real time” via video, and therefore should have known exactly what was happening.
There was of course no live video feed from Libya to any government office; and second, Hannity may have misunderstood Charles Lamb’s testimony that Clinton was in telephone contact with state department officials in Libya as if it were “almost in real time.”
Clinton’s critics apparently did not realize that this claim of real time contact contradicts their accusation that Clinton and Obama were “unaccounted for” during and after the attack. Instead of being asleep—Trump’s libelous charge—Clinton in constant telephone contact with the deputy chief of mission in Libya, but she was also speaking directly with national security adviser Tom Donilon, President Obama, and other administration officials.
With regard to the cause of the attack, UN Ambassador Susan Rice has been rightly criticized for blaming it on an anti-Islamic video that caused protests in Egypt but not Benghazi. From the very beginning, however, Clinton was sure it was a terrorist attack.
On the day after the attack, September 12, 2012, she called the Egyptian prime minister stating that “we know it had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack — not a protest.” On September 21,2012, Clinton declared: “What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans.”
Critics have charged that at a ceremony honoring the Benghazi victims, Clinton told their family members that the video caused the attack. But Jan Stevens, father of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Cheryl Bennet, Tyrone Wood’s mother, and Barbara Doherty, Glen Doherty’s mother, each said that Clinton did not mention the video in conversations with them. Only Charles Wood, Tyrone Wood’s father, recalled that Clinton referred to the video.
Allegations that Clinton ordered the “scrubbing” of Benghazi documents, that she blocked a whistle blower from coming forward, that she was silent about Benghazi attack for weeks, and that she did not take responsibility for the attacks have all been found to be false.
When she was Secretary of State Clinton’s approval ratings were 70 percent, but the fact that they are now at 45 percent is primarily due to this dark cloud of lies hanging over her head.
Nick Gier of Moscow taught philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31 years. Read all of his columns on the 2016 election at www.NickGier.com/Election2016.pdf.
By Nick Gier
Muhammad Ali taught us all that, whatever color you are,
whatever religion you are, you can be proud of who you are.
Most of the nation’s founders were intellectuals who drew moral and political lessons from ancient philosophy. With regard to pride, they would have been aware that Aristotle ranked it as a virtue second only to wisdom. They would also have known that in the Christian tradition pride was one of the seven deadly sins.
Our founders seemed unaware of this fundamental tension in the hybrid culture that they developed from pagan and Christian roots. Most Americans today are not aware of this conflict either. In Sunday School we are taught that boasting is a sin, but the previous Friday or Saturday we were out rooting for our athletic teams with unabashed pride. It is also still common to see the 9/11 bumper sticker “The Power of Pride.”
“It Ain’t Bragging If You Can Do It”
The Greek philosopher Aristotle said that pride is knowing what we have accomplished and freely acknowledging that we have done it. Aristotle did not respect people who hid their lights under a bushel.
National Public Radio’s inspiring series This I Believe ended with an essay by Muhammad Ali, and he sounded just like the brash young boxer we knew in the 1960s. Ali said that he was still the greatest and that everyone could succeed just as he did. Ali was unwittingly following Aristotle when he once proclaimed “It ain’t bragging if you can do it.”
Normally we would not tolerate people who say that they are the greatest even though they may have accomplished much. Do we give Ali a pass because he was a unique personality, or because he was one of the greatest boxers of all time, or because of his great humanitarian accomplishments while crippled with Parkinson’s disease?
As a young black man, facing brutal discrimination at every turn, Ali felt that he had no choice but to lash out and refuse to be yet another “white man’s Negro.” Black athletes were expected to be kind, civil, and grateful, but not Ali.
Here is one of his most provocative statements: “I am America. I am the part you won’t recognize. But get used to me. Black, confident, cocky, my name not yours. My religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me.” Not only did we get used to him, but we have made him into a national hero.
The Press Rebuked Him, but Black Athletes Supported Him
Newspapers persisted in referring to him by his “slave name” Cassius Clay, and Time magazine called him “Gaseous Cassius.” Even Howard University, America’s finest black school, blocked him from speaking in a campus hall. While Floyd Patterson and Jackie Robinson criticized him refusing to enlist, eleven black athletes (led by Jim Brown) and Cleveland mayor Carl Stokes held a news conference on June 4, 1967 to praise his integrity and courage.
One of those present was Walter Beach, outstanding cornerback for the Cleveland Browns. He was temporarily suspended from the team because he organized a protest about travel accommodations. White players stayed in luxury hotels, but black players were put up by local black families. Jim Brown intervened and Beach was back on the team.
Speaking about the news conference, the now 81-year-old Beach said: “It was one of the most significant moments in my life. Ali was one of the most principled and moral human beings on the planet at the time, with the sensitivity and courage to stand.”
In April, 1967, Ali refused to be drafted and he was arrested. He posted bail and waited nearly three years until the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, agreed with his claim that he was a Muslim minister. During this time, he was not allowed to box and he lost these prime years of competition.
“I Ain’t Got No Quarrel with them Viet Cong”
With regard to the Vietnam War, he was defiant: “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Viet Cong. Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human rights?”
He of course had more to say: “My conscience won’t let me go shoot my brother, or some darker people, or some poor hungry people in the mud for big powerful America. And shoot them for what? They never called me nigger, they never lynched me, they didn’t put no dogs on me, they didn’t rob me of my nationality, rape or kill my mother and father. How can I shoot them poor people? Just take me to jail.”
In addition to Bayard Rustin, the gay man who organized the March on Washington and who persuaded Martin Luther King to come out against the Vietnam War, Ali also played a pivotal role. Including Asians in his statement, King declared: “Like Muhammad Ali puts it, we are all — black and brown and poor — victims of the same system of oppression.”
Black Soldiers in Vietnam Doing “Daps”
Black soldiers in Vietnam were galvanized by Ali’s stand against the war. Yusef Komunyakka, a war correspondent for The Southern Cross, writes: “One night in Chu Lai, I heard a black Marine say to a white one, “Look, I don’t want to hear ‘gook’ or ‘dink’ ’cause I don’t know what you’ll call me tomorrow.”
Some black GIs wore “Black Unity” wrist bands, and many of them gave each other fist bumps they called “daps.” As Komunyakka explains: “Behind the dap between young black soldiers in Vietnam was a scream. It was a greeting of kindred souls. At times, the dap seemed choreographed to Ali’s words, a dance of defiance on the edge of battle.”
Ali’s Spiritual Journey: From Malcom X to the Sufis
Ali converted to Islam and took a new name that means “beloved of Allah.” His spiritual journey took him from the radical black nationalism of Malcom X (he said that he never believed that white men were devils), then to orthodox Sunni Islam, and finally to the peace-loving Sufis. His favorite author was the Indian Sufi Hazrat Inayat Khan, who founded the Sufi Order of the West and who believed in the unity of all religions.
Ali of course took umbrage at Donald Trump’s call for banning Muslims from entering the U. S.: “I am a Muslim, and there is nothing Islamic about killing innocent people in Paris, San Bernardino, or anywhere else in the world. True Muslims know the ruthless violence of so-called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion.”
Back in early December President Obama mentioned in passing “sporting heroes” who were Muslims. Donald Trump tweeted: “What sport is he talking about, and who?” In addition to Ali, there are of course boxers Mike Tyson and Bernard Hopkins. Three of the top ten scorers in NBA history are Muslims: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Shaquille O’Neal, and Hakeem Olajuwon. Denver Bronco star Aqib Talib is a Muslim, and so is Muhammad Wilkerson of the New York Jets. Once again Trump puts his small foot in his big mouth.
UN Messenger of Peace
The Muslim world honored Ali and the United Nations made him “A Messenger of Peace.” The king of Muslim Jordan and the president of Muslim Turkey were present at his funeral. In 1979, at the beginning of the Iranian hostage crisis, Ali offered himself as a replacement for Americans held in Tehran, but the Iranians refused.
In 1985 Ali was successful bringing back four Americans held in Beirut, Lebanon. In 1990, six weeks before Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Ali traveled to Baghdad and secured the release of 15 American hostages. Hostage Harry Brill-Edwards said: “I’ve always known that Muhammad Ali was a super sportsman; but during those hours that we were together, inside that enormous body I saw an angel.”
The Butterfly’s Great Soul
In his autobiography The Soul of a Butterfly, Ali wrote: “During my boxing career, you did not see the real Muhammad Ali. After I retired from boxing my true work began. I have embarked on a journey of love.” Special recipients of that love were children. He would pick up and kiss just about any child in reach, and he promised all the little girls that he met that he would come back a marry them.
Tim Shanahan was Ali’s friend for 40 years, and they would always do a morning run together. There was one topic that Ali always wanted to talk about and that was the world’s starving children. According to Shanahan, Ali would usually say: “I believe in miracles. And I believe that one day, all the children in the world will be fed.”
One could argue that because of his fame and wide-spread appeal Ali empowered more people than either Martin Luther King or Nelson Mandela. His promoter Bob Arum states: “He’s the most transforming figure of my time certainly. He did more to change race relations and the views of people than even Martin Luther King.”
In his autobiography Ali writes: “I guess I’d settle for being remembered only as a great boxer who became a leader and a champion of his people,” and with a twinkle in his eye and a glimmer of true humility, adds: “And I wouldn’t even mind if folks forgot how pretty I was.”
The Greek word megalopsychia, which we translate as “pride,” literally means “having a great soul.” Inspired by Aristotle I like to define ethics as the art of making the soul great. I like to define ethics as the art of making the soul great and noble. Just as a jeweler carves a rough stone, each of us is tasked with making ourselves a “gem of a person.”
Muhammad Ali was definitely a great soul, but not the greatest. May this fierce yet gentle soul rest in peace and may he continue to be an inspiration to us all.
Nick Gier of Moscow taught philosophy and religion at the University of Idaho for 31 years. Read all of his columns on civil rights at http://webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/civilrights.htm.
It would appear that the Journal is no longer adding content to the blogs. The columns are now being posted at http://idahostatejournal.com/opinion/columns/ . It appears that one does not have to be a subscriber to read them there, but it would appear that one must be a Facebook user to comment.
I’ve inquired of the editor what the intent is with regard to the blogs, and will pass that on when he updates me.
By Richard Larsen
The discourse on the presidential race has devolved to a point that the most pressing issues seem totally lost in the verbal brawls between candidates. The economic threats and risks to the republic should be the centerpiece of the campaign, for both parties, rather than relegated to a footnote to their public statements.
By Richard Larsen
This could be the first year in a long time that a major political party convention actually serves the function of producing a nominee, rather than simply being a coronation of a nominee. For many who are emotionally invested in a certain outcome from the conventions this year, the angst and outright anger is nearly palpable. But it’s unwarranted, as borne out by history, and an understanding of the function of conventions.
Like attending a Ringling Brothers Circus of playful clowns, high-wire acts, and various mammal tricks, what a cloak and dagger state or nation we exist within - frosted over with misinformation, deception, disinformation, untruths, make-believe, taxation maneuvers, overspending, uncontrollable indebtedness, child-like jealousies, and vulgar exaggerations regarding every social issue, constantly, 24/7. Welcome to acceptability. These characteristics are modern-day decorations of American life through which we're now coping. Our Idaho Legislature is no exception. Each year citizens attempt to understand what our representatives are actually promoting within our state, a statehood half-owned by feds. But from time to time in Idaho, a few rather surprising cry-babies pop up....
149 N. 16th Avenue
Pocatello ID 83201
208-242-3036 or firstname.lastname@example.org
By Richard Larsen
Even the mention of political parties in general brings out the worst in some people, and the reaction only becomes more vociferous and “colorful” when specific parties are mentioned by name. As despised and maligned as the two major parties are, at any given time, it’s amazing they’re still around, even though they fill a crucial role in our American political system. But there has perhaps never been a presidential election in which party affiliation has meant less than in this one.
Let’s Be Pragmatic, However, About Private vs. Public Ownership
By Nick Gier
It is beyond dispute, in all respects, the scheme
[privatizing British Rail] has failed, and failed spectacularly.
—Brendan Martin, international rail expert
It was grand finale of our recent trip to Europe: riding the Eurostar from Paris to London under the English Channel. After some confusion about where the train departed, we were subjected to a security check more stringent than any we had experienced at any airport. We finally settled in on a silky smooth, fast 2-hour trip to London. Read more…